WEBVTT

00:00.100 --> 00:08.292
A failed pre-shipment inspection should not trigger an immediate shipment, an automatic legal rejection, or a photo-only rework claim.

00:08.242 --> 00:11.184
First, place the lot on hold.

00:11.184 --> 00:16.835
Identify the purchase order, product revision, lot, report and inspection date.

00:16.835 --> 00:23.906
Then verify the inspection basis: sample size, AQL, approved specification and evidence IDs.

00:23.906 --> 00:28.736
Acceptance sampling supports a disposition decision for the defined lot.

00:28.736 --> 00:32.460
It does not prove an exact lot-wide defect rate.

00:32.460 --> 00:37.369
Separate critical, major and minor findings from the sampling result.

00:37.369 --> 00:44.309
Contain the inspected lot, identified defects and any adjacent stock that may share the same process cause.

00:44.309 --> 00:47.278
Rework corrects observed product.

00:47.278 --> 00:54.739
Corrective action must also explain why the issue occurred, why process controls missed it and why it was not detected earlier.

00:54.739 --> 01:02.578
The action log should identify scope, containment, root cause, permanent action, owner, due date and acceptance evidence.

01:02.578 --> 01:10.299
Critical, safety, regulatory, systemic or weakly evidenced issues usually justify independent reinspection.

01:10.299 --> 01:15.911
Define the reinspection scope, sampling method and pass criteria before the visit.

01:15.911 --> 01:19.830
Do not let the supplier present only its best carton.

01:19.830 --> 01:29.283
Finally, record one written disposition: accept, accept after verified rework, accept under a documented concession, or reject and replace.

01:29.283 --> 01:33.736
Name the lot, report revision, remaining risk and approver.

01:33.736 --> 01:36.966
A failed report is not the final answer.

01:36.966 --> 01:42.890
An issue-closed statement without evidence and a verification gate is the start of the next failure.